By Greg A. King
Amid the current discussion about the early chapters of Genesis, some have suggested that belief about origins is not a big deal. I disagree. What we believe about Creation matters greatly because our belief in Creation has far-reaching implications for other doctrines and practices as well.
What are those implications, and what can result from rejecting the biblical position on origins?
Whenever the Bible alludes to the Creation story in Genesis, the Scriptures depict Creation as a reliable portrayal of life’s origins. In light of this consistency, there is no credible way to be faithful to a high view of Scripture and hold to an alternative concept of creation, such as progressive creation or theistic evolution. If Scripture is untrustworthy on this point, what else among its teachings should be doubted, modified, and discarded? The Bible’s status as the revealed Word of God is thus in jeopardy.
A second reason why it matters what we believe about Creation follows the first naturally: Jesus had a position on Creation, and the believer’s position should be in harmony. What did Jesus teach about Creation? In Matthew 19:4, Jesus—clearly drawing from the biblical Creation account—asks, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female?”
With this statement, Jesus affirms the biblical position that the first two humans, male and female, were created at the beginning and by a direct act of God. By contrast, progressive creation, theistic evolution, and other variants contend that animal life went on for long periods before humans even came into existence. None of these views hold that humans were created directly by God at the time life began.
A third reason is that the Bible’s doctrine of creation is integrally tied in with its teaching about salvation. The great story of redemption, the theme of the entire Bible, is intimately related to the Creation account.
According to Scripture, God created the world perfect, harmonious, lovely, and free of any taint of sin or death. Because Adam and Eve sinned, they and their descendants became alienated from God. Consequently, death, the penalty for sin, spread over the entire created world. But God enacted a plan: through the gift of His Son, all people have the opportunity to be redeemed and overcome death, the “last enemy.” 1 Cor. 15:26.
Romans 5:12 is key, because it unambiguously states that death came into this world through sin. The clear implication is that, prior to sin, there was no death. Simply put, death was not part of the original Creation.
All other positions on Creation maintain that death has been part of this world ever since the first and simplest forms of life. Not only has death been ever-present in this world, but it also played an essential role in the process by which higher life forms evolved. In other words, death, far from being an enemy and an alien force, was God’s modus operandi in Creation.
Thus, at their core, these alternative theories, if embraced, would destroy our basic understanding of salvation.
The fourth reason why it matters what we believe about Creation is that the biblical portrayal of the new earth in the last book of Scripture, Revelation, parallels the description of God’s original creation. Just as the tree of life was in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 2:9), so it will be in the New Jerusalem. Rev. 22:2. God personally interacted with His children in Eden, sharing His presence with them in a very real way, and such will be the case also in the new earth. Rev. 21:3. As the original world was said by God Himself to be “very good” (Gen. 1:31), implying it was without sin, suffering, and death, so the earth restored will be devoid of these same elements. Rev. 21:4. The earth at the beginning had a source of light apart from the sun (See Gen. 1:3–5, 14–16), and the same is true of the new earth. Rev. 22:5. According to Scripture, the earth restored will be like the earth at the beginning.
If we take Genesis as it reads, we find a good and powerful Creator, instead of an impotent One limited by evolutionary processes.
In contrast, none of the alternative Creation accounts ascribe to the existence of a good and perfect world at the beginning. All depict a world where suffering and death are part of the equation. Whether progressive creation, theistic evolution, or some other variant, none believe that a world devoid of suffering and death ever existed.
The fifth reason why what we believe about Creation matters is its implications about the character of God. The nature of His character is at the heart of the great controversy, the ongoing battle between good and evil. What is more central to the character of God than His benevolence, goodness, graciousness—and love? 1 John 4:8.
How do we know that love is at the core of God’s being? Many things could be emphasized, such as the plan of salvation. God also demonstrated His loving character through Creation. He formed a wonderful, magnificent world and gave it to His human children. He placed them in a beautiful garden in which they could thrive and prosper. He blessed them and gave them dominion. See Gen. 1–2. Nothing that could have added to their happiness or fulfillment was lacking. Clearly, God’s character of love was on display in the world He created.
But what if someone does not accept the biblical record and instead embraces a view such as progressive creation? Because all alternative views on origins hold that God used the process of natural selection over long ages to get to more advanced forms of life, these other views raise grave questions about God’s character. How can we say that God is loving, kind, and benevolent if He used the “law of claw and fang” to create? Is a God who would make extensive use of predation and extinction in order to get to advanced life forms a good and loving God worthy of worship and service? If there never was a world in which perfection reigned, in which suffering, pain, disease, tragedy, and death were nonexistent, the question could be asked, What kind of God do we really serve?
The sixth reason why it matters what we believe about Creation is what it teaches about humanity and human worth.
We as humans have worth and value because of the truth proclaimed in the first chapter of the Bible. Genesis 1:26-27 states, “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in Our image, after Our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.’ So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”
Sometimes verses of Scripture become so familiar that the profound truths they express cease to impress us. It would be tragic should that be true of this passage. What a majestic and profound thought, that humans are a direct creation of God, formed in His own image!
Other perspectives on human origins see us as the result of a long chain of development, moving from invertebrates to vertebrates, progressing from reptiles to birds to mammals. Should a view like this be adopted, one might be tempted to conclude with Stephen Jay Gould: “Why do humans exist? … I do not think that any ‘higher’ answer can be given. We are the offspring of history and must establish our own paths in this most diverse and interesting of conceivable universes—one indifferent to our suffering, and therefore offering us maximal freedom to thrive or to fail, in our own chosen way.”1
The seventh reason why it matters what we believe about Creation is the Sabbath. If we adopt another view on origins and are consistent with that view, following it to its logical conclusion, the Sabbath is stripped of its biblical foundation and loses some of its theological significance. For example, according to progressive creation, long ages elapsed in the history of this earth before humans arrived. At the various major transition points, such as from reptiles to birds and from birds to mammals, God stepped in and performed a creative act.
The Bible's account of Creation elevates the worth of human beings: "So God created man in His own image..."
But what can one say about the Sabbath? If there was no Creation week, as stated in the Bible, when did God rest? The assertions of Genesis 2:2–3 that God “rested on the seventh day from all His work that He had done” and that He “blessed the seventh day and made it holy” become merely a theological metaphor with no historical reality. Or, as some biblical skeptics suggest, they may be the statements of a later Israelite who wanted to make the Sabbath seem more convincing and important by foisting it onto the literary account describing the first week of this planet’s history. Thus, the Sabbath is no memorial of Creation but merely a Jewish institution that some unknown, but resourceful, individual wanted to link with Creation.
Are the declarations of Genesis 2:2–3 true or not? If not, how should we understand the statement of Jesus in Mark 2:27 that “the Sabbath was made for man,” in which our Lord seems to make a clear reference to the setting aside of the Sabbath for humans at the beginning of Earth’s history?
As Bible believers, we should value and treasure the Sabbath day as a memorial of our Lord’s rest from His creative work in Eden; as a memorial of His rest from His redemptive work on the cross; and, as Hebrews 4 suggests, as a foretaste of the ultimate rest we will experience in the kingdom of God. Such theological richness about the Sabbath is diminished if we reject the biblical account of origins.
Ultimately, God gives us the choice about what we believe. We are thus confronted with this fundamental question: Will we accept the Creation story as related in His Word, or will we embrace one of the various alternative positions? Do we opt for a God who, over long periods of time, with minimal involvement, supervised a process by which advanced life forms gradually evolved through pain, suffering, and death? Or do we choose the Lord of Creation described in the Bible, who formed a world that was perfect and beautiful and promises to restore us to that original perfection and beauty?
A great deal depends upon our answer.
All verses quoted are taken from the English Standard Version of the Bible.
Adapted from an article in Ministry® International Journal for Pastors, June 2011 (www.MinistryMagazine.org). Used with permission.
Stephen J. Gould, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (W. W. Norton , 1989), pp. 322–323.
© Sermonview.com
Greg A. King, PhD, is dean of the School of Religion at Southern Adventist University in Collegedale, TN.